Teams

IND-Thompson STA

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-04-25vs STC-StrobleLost 04
L#1 DoublesCharles Benson / Matt MacArthur vs Eric Anderson / Rafe Quinn1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMatt Youngquist vs Mark Callaghan3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Froondozo / Gregory Narver vs Zach Vall-Spinosa / Rob Hendry3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBill McKenzie / John Doe vs Peter Stroble / John Fisk2-6, 1-6
2021-04-16vs CAC/SL-Revengers-JungLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharles Benson / Matt Youngquist vs Brad Raynor / Wayne Stoll5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Doe / Bill McKenzie vs Michael McPherson / John Spaulding6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Thompson / Ryan Froondozo vs Tim Marks / Michael Beals5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-02vs TCSP-The Best Boys-ShaperoWon 31
W#1 DoublesCharles Benson / Matt MacArthur vs Ken Shapero / Steve Suzuki5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMatt Youngquist vs Chester Weir6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTim Jergens / Greg Merlino vs Paul Rose / Michael Chidley4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJames Thompson / Ryan Froondozo vs Brent Baker / Herb Hunt6-3, 6-4
2021-03-26vs PL-WoodSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCharles Benson / Matt Youngquist vs Vasu Rangaswami / Timothy Smith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMatt MacArthur vs Vidya Shastri5-7, 2-5
L#2 DoublesGregory Narver / Bill McKenzie vs Doug Wood / Eric Stern0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJames Thompson / Ryan Froondozo vs David Presba / Raman Kumar6-1, 6-0
2021-03-21vs RBW-Long Shots-RaffettoLost 13
L#1 DoublesRyan Froondozo / Charles Benson vs John Raffetto / Tim Flood6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMatt MacArthur vs Venkat Gandhi6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTim Jergens / John Doe vs Eddy Ferre / David Relyea1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Thompson / Matt Youngquist vs Andy Rivas / Chris Yamamoto3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-03-07vs ETC-TopSpinners-AjoyLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharles Benson / Ryan Froondozo vs Matthew O'Brien / Jonathan Brown3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatt MacArthur / Bill McKenzie vs Gulshan Kharbanda / Amit Mahajan1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJames Thompson / Matt Youngquist vs SasiKumar Natesan / Vincent Keane4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings21 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STC-Stroble062227113
2CAC/SL-Revengers-Jung0615920174
3RBW-Long Shots-Raffetto06101430227
4PL-Wood0671734236
5IND-Thompson STA0681635238
6TCSP-The Best Boys-Shapero0642042267
7MC-Bad Doggies-Ngo0726210179
8RBW-Avengers40-Ravi0722617193
9PSC-Dacia-Frintu0720818219
10CAC/SL-Send In The Clowns-Carey07161225222
11EDG-Warriors-Moosman07151329245
12ETC-Gold Bulls-Liu07141430234
13TCSP-Twelve Pack with Shots-Holland07141432259
14BTA-M. Day07151332267
15BC-Lin07121633246
16CP-Markman07131534256
17TCSP-DiMartino07131535249
18RTC-Team Lash07111735270
19HBSQ-Frog and Volley-Borgida07101838287
20IND-40 Rocks-Chou0752347307
21BC-Hitmen-Seeley0752347308

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
James Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Matt Youngquist
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Ryan Froondozo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Tim Jergens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Bill McKenzie
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Matt MacArthur
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.50
Manuel Moises
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.20
Greg Merlino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Gregory Narver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Thompson + Matt Youngquist5356% games+9.1% vs expected
Greg Merlino + Tim Jergens0728% games−13.8% vs expected
Matt MacArthur + Matt Youngquist3258% gamesnot enough data
James Thompson + Ryan Froondozo314 matchesnot enough data
James Thompson + Matt MacArthur033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
James Thompson
31W–60L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%<1%>99%
3.05
3
Matt Youngquist
66W–45L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Ryan Froondozo
19W–34L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Tim Jergens
25W–66L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Bill McKenzie
26W–29L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Matt MacArthur
48W–51L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Manuel Moises
35W–41L career · 2 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
2.50
2.5
Greg Merlino
12W–66L career · 1 line in 2021
0%99%1%
2.20
0
Gregory Narver
15W–27L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.