Teams

Diamondhead - Wilkerson

2026 Mixed 55 & Over-GC · 3.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-09vs Newman-TOCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesArianne Poole / Ladson Poole vs Shari Newman / Bubba Newman6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / Freddie Wilkerson vs Lisa Chapman / John Cleary5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeigh Ann Reynolds / ED LOZES vs Toni Fillmore / James Whitney2-6, 4-6
2026-07-06vs BBTC BaughmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesArianne Poole / Ladson Poole vs Laurie Baughman / Craig Brown6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / Freddie Wilkerson vs Betsy Taylor / Marty Warren6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRhonda Lohmeyer / Jan Lohmeyer vs Amy Knight / Johnny Frazier3-6, 2-6
2026-07-02vs 55+ Mixed 3.0 Biloxi- MacNaughtonWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Lohmeyer / Jan Lohmeyer vs Mike Dengler / Terry OConnor6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / ED LOZES vs Jennifer Mitchell / Charlie Neumann7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Bearden / William Warren vs Jan Roberts / Harold Roberts4-6, 3-6
2026-06-24vs BBTC BaughmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / ED LOZES vs Amy Knight / Johnny Frazier6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane Bearden / Freddie Wilkerson vs Jaime Denmark / Craig Brown3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLeigh Ann Reynolds / William Lingsch vs Laurie Baughman / Marty Warren3-6, 2-6
2026-06-11vs 55+ Mixed 3.0 Biloxi- MacNaughtonWon 30
W#1 DoublesArianne Poole / Ladson Poole vs Shirley Brehm / Harold Roberts6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / Freddie Wilkerson vs Mike Dengler / Ellen Berry6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRhonda Lohmeyer / Jan Lohmeyer vs Jan Roberts / John Greer6-1, 6-0
2026-06-03vs BBTC BaughmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / Freddie Wilkerson vs Laurie Baughman / Marty Warren7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRhonda Lohmeyer / Jan Lohmeyer vs Amy Knight / David Boggs6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeigh Ann Reynolds / ED LOZES vs Lee Ann Hunter / Scott Pridgen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-26vs Newman-TOCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / Freddie Wilkerson vs Mary Ashbaker / Robbie Johnson6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRhonda Lohmeyer / Jan Lohmeyer vs Connie Johnston / Jim Sukiennik1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJo Ann Lozes / ED LOZES vs Mildred Dickson / Chris Ashbaker6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-19vs Newman-TOCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesArianne Poole / Ladson Poole vs John Cleary / Connie Johnston6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRhonda Lohmeyer / Jan Lohmeyer vs James Whitney / Toni Fillmore6-1, 2-1
W#3 DoublesJane Bearden / William Warren vs Bubba Newman / Shari Newman6-2, 6-3
2026-05-14vs 55+ Mixed 3.0 Biloxi- MacNaughtonLost 12
L#1 DoublesArianne Poole / Ladson Poole vs Holly Bourgeois / Mike Dengler7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Wilkerson / Freddie Wilkerson vs Shirley Brehm / Charlie Neumann6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJane Bearden / William Lingsch vs Jan Roberts / Harold Roberts3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Diamondhead - Wilkerson7218922196
2BBTC Baughman54151228250
355+ Mixed 3.0 Biloxi- MacNaughton2791840279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Ladson Poole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Freddie Wilkerson
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Arianne Poole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Karen Wilkerson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.83
Jan Lohmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
William Warren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Rhonda Lohmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
ED LOZES
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.66
William Lingsch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Jo Ann Lozes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Leigh Ann Reynolds
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ladson Poole + Arianne Poole9464% games+13.1% vs expected
Jan Lohmeyer + Rhonda Lohmeyer7260% games+11.9% vs expected
Karen Wilkerson + Freddie Wilkerson19362% games+9.1% vs expected
Jo Ann Lozes + ED LOZES213 matchesnot enough data
ED LOZES + Karen Wilkerson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ladson Poole
33W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Freddie Wilkerson
35W–19L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Arianne Poole
33W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
Karen Wilkerson
44W–25L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
Jan Lohmeyer
14W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
William Warren
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Rhonda Lohmeyer
15W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.76
ED LOZES
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
William Lingsch
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
Jo Ann Lozes
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
Leigh Ann Reynolds
18W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%29%71%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.