Teams

Churchey/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 18 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-11vs Sampson/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Brkic / Susan Dacus vs Chancey Thompson / Betsy Brown6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicky Wander / Lisa McIntosh vs Casey Tidwell / Melissa Sherrod3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Stockton / Debbie Churchey vs Elza McKenna / Melanie Schrank7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Louisa Bowie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Kim Whipple
published
3.21
Carla Higgins
published 3
3.19
Kelly McCool
published
3.14
Michelle Stockton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Laura Cary
published
3.10
Nicole Brkic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Nicky Wander
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Debbie Churchey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Julie Mullins
published
2.93
Harriet Dodd
published
2.85
Joana Thompson
published
2.84
Jennifer Musgrave
published
2.77
Susan Dacus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Nancy Bush
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Higgins + Debbie Churchey12266% games+6.0% vs expected
Susan Dacus + Jennifer Musgrave4356% games+5.4% vs expected
Julie Mullins + Joana Thompson2445% games−5.9% vs expected
Kim Whipple + Michelle Stockton4743% games−8.3% vs expected
Susan Dacus + Carla Higgins134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Dacus + Michelle Stockton134 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Churchey + Michelle Stockton213 matchesnot enough data
Louisa Bowie + Jennifer Musgrave213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Louisa Bowie
24W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Kim Whipple
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
3
Carla Higgins
37W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
Kelly McCool
5W–14L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
Michelle Stockton
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.14
Laura Cary
8W–12L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Nicole Brkic
33W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.10
Nicky Wander
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Debbie Churchey
31W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Julie Mullins
6W–13L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Harriet Dodd
32W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Joana Thompson
12W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Jennifer Musgrave
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Susan Dacus
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Nancy Bush
12W–2L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.