Teams

Mack Attack - Affentrangner

2021 One Doubles · 4.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Sandy Garry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Carol Woolman
published 4.5
4.18
Amanda Solomon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Heidi Affentranger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Results6 ties
2021-08-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Affentranger / Amanda Solomon vs Michelle Donato / Chiho Cronk6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-08-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Woolman / Sandy Garry vs Deanna Lautenbach / Sue Gregoire6-4, 6-4
2021-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Affentranger / Sandy Garry vs Michelle Mehr / Kira Dennison Capen7-6, 6-4
2021-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Affentranger / Sandy Garry vs Leslie OBrien / Mary Bullard7-6, 6-1
2021-07-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Affentranger / Amanda Solomon vs Trish Vawter / Timora Konigwilcox6-1, 7-5
2021-06-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Solomon / Sandy Garry vs Leslie OBrien / Mary Bullard6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Sandy Garry
145W–81L career
not enough data
4.5
Carol Woolman
31W–13L career · type S
1%96%3%
4.23
4.5
Amanda Solomon
138W–71L career
1%99%0%
4.18
4.5
Heidi Affentranger
78W–81L career
18%82%0%
3.99

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.