← Search

Sandy Garry

Sherwood, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 145W–81L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Sandy Garry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history226 matches
L
Leslie Airola-Murveit / Andrea Barnes
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · with Janet Tabor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
Cynthia Kuertz / Cathy Thompson
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · with Karen Sullivan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Amy Badger / Laurie Byrne
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · with Janet Tabor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Lorrie Crossett / Victoria Wright
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · with Janet Tabor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-01-30 · #2 Doubles · with Chris Ramsower-Pearlstein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-4
W
Jeanne Hulsen / Kristin Hartley
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · with Janet Tabor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Colleen Sharkey / Jim Clerget
2025-09-22 · #3 Doubles · with Paul Garry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-21 · #2 Doubles · with Paul Garry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-09-21 · #2 Doubles · with Paul Garry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · with Paul Garry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-14 · #3 Doubles · with Chris Ramsower-Pearlstein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-09-14 · #1 Doubles · with Chris Ramsower-Pearlstein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams122 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
64.8%
35W–19L · 55.2% of games
5.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.5% of games
9.0
85.7%
24W–4L · 61.4% of games
8.0mixed
76.5%
13W–4L · 64.6% of games
9.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
36 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe