← Search

Rise Hawley

Richland, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 112W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rise Hawley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-05-31 · IND-Rose · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-30 · IND-Rose · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynne Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · IND-Rose · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynne Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-29 · IND-Rose · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynne Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-11 · EW-CBRC-Knox · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Judy Knox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-10 · EW-CBRC-Knox · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · EW-CBRC-Knox · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Judy Knox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-10-18 · CBRC-Sweet and Sassy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynne Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-10-18 · CBRC-Sweet and Sassy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynne Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-10-17 · CBRC-Sweet and Sassy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-17 · CBRC-Sweet and Sassy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-21 · #2 Doubles · with Larry Floyd championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
52.5%
21W–19L · 51.7% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.4% of games
8.0
81.6%
40W–9L · 60.8% of games
9.0
60%
3W–2L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
16W–20L · 47.6% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
42 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe