← Search

Peg Bogard

Hood River, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 26W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Peg Bogard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · with Allison Crisp championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Melanie Niceler / Whitney Jones
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · with Anne Kelly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · with Tammy Carter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-22 · HRSC-Carter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Crisp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-22 · HRSC-Carter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · HRSC-Carter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Crisp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-21 · HRSC-Carter · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-20 · HRSC-Carter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-18 · HRSC-Bogard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Seatter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-10-18 · HRSC-Bogard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Seatter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-10-17 · HRSC-Bogard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melanie Finstad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-24 · VTC-Chiu · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michele Beaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
4.5
36.8%
14W–24L · 45% of games
8.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.7% of games
9.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer