Search

Lisa Chapman

Richland, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
65 matches · 38W–27L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.85
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
97%
stay 4.0
3%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.81. Lower than today’s 3.85 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Richland · 4.0
3 of 7
WA · 4.0
87 of 888

Lisa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has been 4.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Lisa has gone from the 5th to the 70th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 49.9% of games
8.0
75%
6W–2L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history65 matches
W
Estelle Patten / Laural Klein
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Porter
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Amy Nguyen / Emily McNabb
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Porter
+0.010better than expected — took 59% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Tamara McGregor / Melanie Niceler
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Porter
+0.044better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Porter
0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
Kaneko Bell / Michael Hamasuchamps
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · with Edward Kim
+0.081better than expected — took 92% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Nathan Johnston / Rachel Morrisseychamps
2025-11-07 · #3 Doubles · with Edward Kim
0.039below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-09-20 · #2 Doubles · with Matt Glenn
0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Jeff Chaney / Natalie Prydechamps
2025-09-19 · #3 Doubles · with Edward Kim
+0.023better than expected — took 62% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Kristin Gallagher / Megan Millerchamps
2025-08-23 · #1 Doubles · with Amy Nguyen
0.018below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-08-22 · #1 Doubles · with Amy Nguyen
+0.039better than expected — took 71% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Annette Rose / Kira Burt
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Nguyen
+0.015better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
Angela Kerndl / Anne Rojan
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Nguyen
0.050below expectation — took 25% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.