← Search

Jill Spaulding

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Hood Parkdale, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 19W–20L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history39 matches
W
2026-10-18 · HRSC-Bogard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammy Carter
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-10-17 · HRSC-Bogard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammy Carter
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-10-16 · HRSC-Bogard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammy Carter
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-16 · HRSC-Bogard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melanie Finstad
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-11 · HRSC-Robertson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kerry Spajic
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-11 · HRSC-Robertson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Robertson
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-10 · HRSC-Robertson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kerry Spajic
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-19 · HRSC-Bogard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melanie Finstad
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-18 · HRSC-Bogard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melanie Finstad
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-17 · HRSC-Bogard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Seatter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
W
2023-10-22 · IND-Bogard · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Peg Bogard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-10-21 · IND-Bogard · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kerry Spajic
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 39.2% of games
8.0
60%
15W–10L · 51.2% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer