Teams

A.OLIVER 4.0 18

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-14vs R.LindsayLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeff Keisner / Nick Zelano vs Howard Marsilio / Matthew Horney4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesChris Fuhrer vs Ryan Lindsay4-6, 0-6
2023-04-23vs S.WingoLost 02
L#1 DoublesEdward Hu / Brent Lamm vs Nick Cox / Gavin Mazurak3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChris Fuhrer vs Matt Shait0-6, 0-6
2023-04-09vs R.LindsayLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Keisner / Brent Lamm vs Ryan Lindsay / Adam Dailey1-6, 0-6
2023-04-04vs S.WingoLost 02
L#1 DoublesEdward Hu / Chris Fuhrer vs Barrett Rankin / Neil Hauge2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Keisner / Ted Lotchin vs Brad Baur / See Boon Soo2-6, 3-6
2023-03-19vs F.SUNWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Fuhrer / Edward Hu vs Francis Sun / Manuel Cantillo1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrent Lamm / Matthew Smith vs Dale Lambe / John Hulicki7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Nick Zelano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Ted Lotchin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.40
Samir Naik
published
3.37
Mark Wood
published
3.36
Allen Oliver
published 4
3.35
Brent Lamm
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Chris Fuhrer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Jeff Keisner
published
Edward Hu
published
Miguel Materin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ted Lotchin + Brent Lamm6453% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nick Zelano
55W–72L career · 1 line in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Ted Lotchin
159W–115L career · 5 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Samir Naik
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.40
Mark Wood
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
4
Allen Oliver
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.36
3.5
Brent Lamm
153W–106L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Chris Fuhrer
73W–97L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Jeff Keisner
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Edward Hu
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Miguel Materin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.