Teams

IRMSL/Blvd - Orthober

2021 IRMSL Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Women T

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-11-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesDenny Storey / Claudia Berk vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie London / Lauren Kushner vs Penelope Chambers / Charlotte Walters2-6, 1-6
2021-11-09vs Nrs - MurrayWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeslie London / Lauren Kushner vs Grace Pillari / Sue Davis6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2021-11-02vs Buttonwood - Theresa DubielWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeslie London / Kelly Flipse vs Anne Penn / Theresa Dubiel6-2, 6-4
2021-10-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie London / Claudia Berk vs Michele Modica / Ann Weiner6-4, 7-6
2021-10-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie London / Claudia Berk vs Cynthia DiNenna / Nancy Alvarez1-6, 3-6
2021-09-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichele Packard / Leslie London vs Deborah Lloyd / Marla Simons6-4, 6-3
2021-09-21vs Nrs - MurrayLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Flipse / Leslie London vs Reinalyn Albrecht / Sue Davis4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women T have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Lana Heinze
published
3.77
Wendy Orthober
published
3.75
Allison Ritter
published 4
3.69
Mary Lunn
published
3.60
Leslie London
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.51
Anita Venner
published 4
3.44
Lauren Kushner
published
3.27
Claudia Berk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Lydia Kennedy
published
Michele Packard
published
Sherri Glaab
published
Terri Blando
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lana Heinze
38W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
Wendy Orthober
72W–23L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Allison Ritter
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Mary Lunn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Leslie London
47W–59L career · 7 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Anita Venner
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.51
Lauren Kushner
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Claudia Berk
71W–60L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Lydia Kennedy
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michele Packard
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherri Glaab
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Terri Blando
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.