Teams

CIN Indy Singles, 3.0 W, Hamer (CRC)

Late Summer Singles USTA Central Indiana League · CIN Late Summer 3.0 Women, Singles

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 SinglesBeth Cottingham vs Sereena Abraham4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHannah Ott vs Jit N Hinchman6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesLaura Combs vs Cynthia Harris6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBeth Cottingham vs Cynthia Harris6-0, 2-2
L#3 SinglesTheresa - Teri HAMER vs Michelle Williams3-6, 3-1
W#2 SinglesTheresa - Teri HAMER vs Sereena Abraham6-2, 2-4
W#1 SinglesBeth Cottingham vs Sarah Miller6-3, 3-4
W#2 SinglesSonia Powels vs Michelle Williams6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHannah Ott vs Sereena Abraham7-6, 2-1
W#2 SinglesSonia Powels vs Jit N Hinchman6-3, 3-2
W#3 SinglesTheresa - Teri HAMER vs Cynthia Harris6-4, 2-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · CIN Late Summer 3.0 Women, Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CIN Indy Singles, 3.0 W, Hamer (CRC)3210512102
2CIN Indy Singles, 3.0 W, Hinchman (CRC)2351018115

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Laura Combs
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.08
Hannah Ott
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Beth Cottingham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.87
Sonia Powels
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Kelly Owens
published
Theresa - Teri HAMER
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Combs
165W–75L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.34
3.5
Hannah Ott
50W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Beth Cottingham
78W–118L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.97
Sonia Powels
47W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.87
Kelly Owens
30W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Theresa - Teri HAMER
31W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.