Teams

Cindy Hummel Tennis / Tijerina

2026 Polk Adult 40 & Over - Women · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-03vs Beerman Family/ EscowitzLost 02
L#1 DoublesCrystal Tijerina / Kristin Levy vs Brooklyn Lindsey / Ashley Mcentire0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Schneider vs Donna Mcwilliams1-6, 6-7
2026-05-27vs POLK/40&Over2.5W/FazziniSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCrystal Tijerina / Kristin Spencer vs Susan Cruze / Courtney Boynton6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJessica Schneider / Jenny Black vs Jessica Fazzini / Alexis Wharem3-6, 5-7
2026-05-13vs Beerman Family/ EscowitzLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Feaster / Kristin Spencer vs Ashley Mcentire / Brooke Wilson6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJessica Schneider vs Brooklyn Lindsey1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Levy / Niki Sadler vs Donna Mcwilliams / Julie Thompson1-6, 0-6
2026-05-06vs POLK/40&Over2.5W/FazziniLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Feaster / Jessica Schneider vs Jessica Fazzini / Alexis Wharem2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJenny Black vs Adriana G.Daunt4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Spencer / Crystal Tijerina vs Susan Cruze / Courtney Boynton6-2, 6-3
2026-04-22vs Beerman Family/ EscowitzLost 01
L#1 DoublesJenny Black / Kelly Turner vs Ashley Mcentire / Donna Mcwilliams4-6, 1-6
2026-04-15vs POLK/40&Over2.5W/FazziniLost 02
L#1 DoublesCrystal Tijerina / Lauren Feaster vs Jessica Fazzini / Amy Tully0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Schneider / Kristin Levy vs Alexis Wharem / Diana Williams3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1POLK/40&Over2.5W/Fazzini5113511120
2Beerman Family/ Escowitz4211715129
3Cindy Hummel Tennis / Tijerina0631530195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.45
Kelly Turner
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.37
Kristi Durden
published
2.16
Jenny Black
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.16
Lauren Feaster
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.05
Jessica Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.02
Crystal Tijerina
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.85
Kristin Levy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Feaster + Kelly Turner3543% games+2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Turner
5W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
Kristi Durden
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Jenny Black
0W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Lauren Feaster
4W–21L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Jessica Schneider
2W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Crystal Tijerina
6W–9L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Kristin Levy
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.