Teams

WTC - Edwards 18 & Over 5.5 Combo

2026 Dothan USTA Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.60 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-26vs WTC - Poston 18 & Over 5.5 ComboLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Necessary / Angie Saliba vs Katie Ercen / Katherine Martin3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBay Chapman / Evee Ventress vs Faith Harmon / Lily Mendoza0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMackenzie Thomley / Amanda Roberson vs Erin Johnson / Kylie Harris1-6, 1-6
2026-08-19vs WTC - Poston 18 & Over 5.5 ComboLost 02
L#1 DoublesBay Chapman / Angie Saliba vs Caroline Dozier / Ashley Barron0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrittany Dollar / Allison Necessary vs Katie Ercen / Amber Holland0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WTC - Poston 18 & Over 5.5 Combo000000
2WTC - Edwards 18 & Over 5.5 Combo000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Allison Edwards
published 3
2.56
Allison Necessary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.48
Bay Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Angie Saliba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Brittany Dollar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Evee Ventress
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mackenzie Thomley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Edwards
14W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91
2.5
Allison Necessary
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
2.5
Bay Chapman
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Angie Saliba
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Brittany Dollar
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Evee Ventress
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mackenzie Thomley
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.