Teams

Oakwood - Blake

2026 Combo 40 & Over Women Night - Mobile · 6.5 Women Night

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-09vs MTC - Grimes/HesterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSylvia Ankiewicz / Wende Zimmerman vs Tracy Woodall / Kim Pugh6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathy Barnett / Christie Keller vs Beth Mathison / Holly Rawls4-6, 3-6
2026-07-02vs MTC - Grimes/HesterLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathy Clark / Amy Kendall vs Kelly Chism / Brantley Caldwell5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Warren / Reenie Kinney vs Melanie Buckner / Rebecca Pope1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Eways / Wende Zimmerman vs Debbie Taylor / Jan Fontenot3-6, 2-6
2026-06-25vs MTC - Grimes/HesterLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Wacker / Christie Keller vs Debbie Taylor / Brantley Caldwell3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDianne Nolan / Jean Hernandez vs Melanie Buckner / Samantha Christopher4-6, 3-6
2026-06-11vs MTC - Grimes/HesterLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristie Keller / Kathy Clark vs Jan Fontenot / Debbie Taylor1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesReenie Kinney / Mary Wacker vs Cathy Hilpert / Beth Mathison1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesShannon Blake / Lisa Warren vs Kim Pugh / Tracy Woodall2-6, 1-6
2026-06-04vs MTC - Grimes/HesterLost 12
L#1 DoublesSylvia Ankiewicz / Jean Hernandez vs Denise Hester / Brantley Caldwell4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDianne Nolan / Tena Baine vs Tracy Woodall / Jan Fontenot6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Warren / Teri Hill vs Michele Grimes / Rebecca Pope2-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs MTC - Grimes/HesterLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Clark / Susan Eways vs Kelly Chism / Rebecca Pope3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Conrey / Reenie Kinney vs Denise Hester / Brantley Caldwell1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Barnett / Shannon Blake vs Beth Mathison / Cathy Hilpert3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Kathy Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Sylvia Ankiewicz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Mary Wacker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Dianne Nolan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Kathy Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Julie Conrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Amy Kendall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Susan Eways
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Christie Keller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Wende Zimmerman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Jean Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Reenie Kinney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Shannon Blake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Tena Baine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Teri Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Kendall + Kathy Clark13366% games+9.1% vs expected
Reenie Kinney + Kathy Clark3347% games+6.2% vs expected
Susan Eways + Kathy Clark111249% games+1.3% vs expected
Mary Wacker + Julie Conrey1548% games−2.4% vs expected
Susan Eways + Amy Kendall224 matchesnot enough data
Sylvia Ankiewicz + Dianne Nolan033 matchesnot enough data
Christie Keller + Jean Hernandez303 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Clark + Dianne Nolan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Clark
73W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.28
Sylvia Ankiewicz
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Mary Wacker
21W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Dianne Nolan
13W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
3.09
Kathy Barnett
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08
Julie Conrey
11W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Amy Kendall
44W–20L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Susan Eways
56W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Christie Keller
18W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Wende Zimmerman
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Jean Hernandez
22W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Reenie Kinney
28W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Shannon Blake
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Tena Baine
12W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Teri Hill
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.