Teams

Martin's Mill

2025 Tri-Level League · Men 5.0, 4.5, 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.14 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-13vs Hit TalkersLost 01
L#1 DoublesClint Huang / Benito Pelayo vs John Cornelius / Ignacio Rivera6-7, 2-6
2024-10-12vs Bandit EliteLost 03
L#1 DoublesAbraham Cantu / Joshua Bowman vs Chad Nguyen / Luis Hernandez1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Jorgensen / Zachary Crowley-Kurth vs Jordan Fowler / Marcello Garza4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesArturo Samaniego / Clint Huang vs Quang Nguyen / Gustavo Solis4-6, 4-6
2024-10-11vs Bandit EliteLost 03
L#1 DoublesAbraham Cantu / Joshua Bowman vs Travis Wagner / Estanislado Martinez2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Martin / Zachary Crowley-Kurth vs Jordan Fowler / Jason Finley1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBen Garza / Jaime Medina vs Saurabh Gupta / Ignacio Rivera3-6, 3-6
2024-10-11vs Nett NutzLost 01
L#1 DoublesBenito Pelayo / Tom McCloy vs Mario Morales / Landon Blair6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-06vs Tri AgainWon 10
W#2 DoublesClint Huang / Benito Pelayo vs Jeffrey Hackett / Bill Barkley6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Abraham Cantu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Daniel Garza
published 4.5
4.07
Zachary Crowley-Kurth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Ben Garza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Edward Villarreal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Jaime Medina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Benito Pelayo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Clint Huang
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.32
Lay Chittarath
published
Joshua Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Philip Jorgensen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abraham Cantu
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Daniel Garza
12W–30L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
Zachary Crowley-Kurth
18W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Ben Garza
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Edward Villarreal
21W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Jaime Medina
14W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Benito Pelayo
23W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Clint Huang
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lay Chittarath
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.32
Joshua Bowman
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Philip Jorgensen
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.