Teams

BENT.Wagner

2026 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-12vs NMAC.WadsworthLost 03
L#1 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Dianna White1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLea Ann Baker vs Mari Stratemeier2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesClaudia Bownes vs Sarah London0-6, 3-6
2026-08-05vs ANP.KraftLost 12
W#1 SinglesClaudia Bownes vs Kristin Comer7-6, 7-6
L#2 SinglesChristine Qubeck vs Susan Stover2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesKelly Walton vs Stephanie Levin2-6, 0-6
2026-08-04vs KF.ScagnelliWon 10
W#2 SinglesChristine Qubeck vs Sarah Forman7-5, 6-1
2026-07-29Lost 01
L#2 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Tara Navarro2-6, 3-6
2026-07-21vs ACP.ManessLost 12
L#1 SinglesChristine Qubeck vs Emily Haverstick4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMegan Wagner vs Julie Wray6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLea Ann Baker vs Laura Maroglou1-6, 1-6
2026-06-24vs MCP.AlvarezSplit 11
L#1 SinglesClaudia Bownes vs Yelizaveta Petrova3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMegan Wagner vs Lisa Brandman6-4, 6-3
2026-06-17vs NMAC.HainLost 12
L#1 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Jennifer Johnson0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesChristine Qubeck vs Sabrina Hsin Hua Lee5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesKelly Walton vs Kristin Baldyga4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-15vs ANP.KraftSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Allison Kupfrian6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLea Ann Baker vs Heather Suddreth4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Megan Wagner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Tracy Grasser
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.75
Claudia Bownes
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.64
Lea Ann Baker
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.62
Christine Qubeck
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.41
Kelly Walton
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Wagner
21W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Tracy Grasser
145W–131L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Claudia Bownes
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Lea Ann Baker
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Christine Qubeck
59W–83L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Kelly Walton
16W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.