Teams

Team 5 Nadeshiko 3.5

2021 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer Indoor · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.56 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-14vs Team 1 ServivorsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Weinstein / Errin Matechak vs Ellen Dague / Eva Domotorffy2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRegina Famiglietti / Joan Kissal vs Jessica Harris / Jolyn Green0-6, 2-6
2021-07-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Dolan / Sachi Pilkenton vs Amanda Wenzel / Kendra Escoto4-6, 5-1
2021-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Schrieber / Anna Weinstein vs Silvia Gulino / Dawn Siebenhaar3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-28Won 20
W#1 DoublesErrin Matechak / Anna Weinstein vs Claire Gilbert / Jennifer Jacobs6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoan Kissal / Sachi Pilkenton vs Connie Watson / Joan Flippin6-0, 6-1
2021-06-26vs Team 2 Tennis AddictsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSachi Pilkenton / Ikuko Dimond vs Amy Farabow / Andrea Dao6-2, 6-1
2021-06-22vs Team 12Won 10
W#1 DoublesDanielle Frazier / Errin Matechak vs Elizabeth Law / Patti Rich4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Errin Matechak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Carolyn Healy
published 4
3.69
Sarah Schrieber
published
3.35
Anna Weinstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Jackie Dolan
published 3.5
3.27
Joanne Good
published 3.5
3.19
Danielle Frazier
published 3.5
3.06
Sachi Pilkenton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Joan Kissal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lauren Rowley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Weinstein + Errin Matechak6360% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Errin Matechak
176W–161L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Carolyn Healy
49W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
Sarah Schrieber
42W–44L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Anna Weinstein
99W–78L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Jackie Dolan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Joanne Good
85W–87L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Danielle Frazier
12W–20L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Sachi Pilkenton
69W–71L career · 3 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Joan Kissal
55W–98L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lauren Rowley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.