Teams

Durboraw

2022 FW Tri-Level · Womens 3.0-3.5-4.0 (lower)

11 players · average NTRP 3.57 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Womens 3.0-3.5-4.0 (lower) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Gilda Tebeaux
published 4
3.71
Teresa Albus
published
3.56
Kim Kerby-Dickman
published
3.37
Anne Broyles
published 4
3.27
Lola Gomez
published
3.26
Gracie Santana
published 3.5
Amy Flowers
published 3.5
3.13
Allison Nicks
published 3.5
3.12
Antorrya Calderon
published 3.5
Paula Suter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Broyles + Kim Kerby-Dickman21043% games+2.2% vs expected
Gracie Santana + Antorrya Calderon41044% games−4.2% vs expected
Allison Nicks + Lola Gomez224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gilda Tebeaux
37W–32L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Teresa Albus
32W–27L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Kim Kerby-Dickman
11W–24L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Anne Broyles
5W–14L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
3.37
Lola Gomez
21W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Gracie Santana
18W–28L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Amy Flowers
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Allison Nicks
12W–20L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Antorrya Calderon
7W–29L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
Cecilia Gallardo Solano
42W–47L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
Paula Suter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.