Teams

Burkwood - Colgin

2024 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.64 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-17vs ACAC SinghWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Owens / Mike Davis vs Brian Holahan / Susan Lockhart6-3, 7-5
2024-11-09vs Avalon - WilliamsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelissa Stewart / Mike Davis vs Kelly Stalls / Chris Giacchi2-6, 3-6
2024-10-20vs 7.5 Sal's Mixed Nuts ShafferWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeanne Jones / Mike Davis vs Drew Lineberger / Carla Shaffer6-2, 6-3
2024-10-12vs ACAC/Davis C.C CrushersWon 10
W#3 DoublesJane Colgin / Mike Davis vs Grace Kim / Jeffrey Foddrell2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-06vs Woodlake-RitterLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrew Barth / Jane Colgin vs Peter Schneeberger / Peggy McElgunn4-6, 1-6
2024-09-29vs WO Mixed Combo HaasLost 01
L#2 DoublesHolly Miles / Mike Davis vs Yancey Haas / Danny MacNelly7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Ashley Hart
published 4.5
3.96
Susan Powell
published
3.89
Leanne Jones
published
3.82
Jennifer Owens
published
Brady Smith
published 4
3.62
Michael Hazelwood
published
3.57
Meredith White
published
3.43
Andrew Barth
published 3.5
3.35
Holly Miles
published 3.5
3.31
Jane Colgin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Mike Davis
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Travis Prowant
published
2.71
Andrew Powell
published 3
Joseph Golden
published
Melissa Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Colgin + Mike Davis6249% gamesnot enough data
Susan Powell + Andrew Powell213 matchesnot enough data
Meredith White + Michael Hazelwood123 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Barth + Ashley Hart123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Hart
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
4.34
Susan Powell
32W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
Leanne Jones
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.89
Jennifer Owens
31W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Brady Smith
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Hazelwood
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.62
Meredith White
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Andrew Barth
17W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Holly Miles
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Jane Colgin
160W–148L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Mike Davis
95W–71L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
Travis Prowant
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Andrew Powell
31W–20L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
Joseph Golden
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Stewart
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.