Teams

CCW YOUNG

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-21vs LTFCS MUELLERWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracy Slater / Victoria Walker vs Camille Ku / Suzanne Draper6-2, 6-2
2025-08-14vs CSRC GONZALESLost 12
W#1 DoublesTracy Slater / Kathy Rex vs Diane Scott / Karen Ohl7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaren Shuman vs Mary Beth Yockey1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVictoria Walker / Lori Littleford vs Stephanie Brock / Jennifer Peck6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-08-12vs CSRC GONZALESLost 12
L#1 DoublesIrene Mo / Tracy Slater vs Lou Ann McClendon / Mary Beth Yockey4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesVictoria Walker vs Jennifer Gonzales4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLori Littleford / Kathy Rex vs Erin Rhodes / Sutton Spanton6-3, 6-4
2025-08-07Won 10
W#1 SinglesTracy Slater vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-31vs FLYHS COUTUREWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Slater / Leslie Leaf vs Kristi Couture / Molly Scott5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Kim Young
published
3.28
Tracy Slater
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Leslie Leaf
published
3.08
Victoria Walker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.89
Karen Shuman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.80
Irene Mo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lori Littleford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maggie Ward
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Littleford + Kim Young4455% games+2.4% vs expected
Tracy Slater + Leslie Leaf7652% games−2.8% vs expected
Tracy Slater + Kim Young134 matchesnot enough data
Kim Young + Leslie Leaf314 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Slater + Irene Mo033 matchesnot enough data
Kim Young + Victoria Walker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Young
62W–59L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Tracy Slater
97W–75L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Leslie Leaf
21W–22L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Victoria Walker
12W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Karen Shuman
30W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Irene Mo
22W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Lori Littleford
33W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maggie Ward
6W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.