Teams

Kiwi - Smith

2025 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-08vs Brevard/DeFile/Combo18&Over7.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Carpenter / Martin Rojas vs David Castillo / Trey Crowley0-6, 0-6
2025-10-01vs Fee - BiellingWon 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Smith / Thomas Hargrove vs Robert Mccarthy / Robert Bielling6-4, 6-3
2025-09-24vs EFSC - ZavaletaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Hertzog / Tony Famiano vs Matt Thurner / David Carver6-3, 7-6
2025-09-10vs Fee - BiellingWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Carpenter / Thomas Hargrove vs Nicholas Oglesby / Anilgowthamkumar Geddam6-1, 6-1
2025-09-03vs EFSC - ZavaletaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Carpenter / Martin Rojas vs James Combs / Isidro Zavaleta6-4, 7-6
2025-08-27vs Brevard/DeFile/Combo18&Over7.5MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChad Shoultz / Benjamin Smith vs Daniel Evans / David Castillo6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMartin Rojas / Andrew Aronson vs Nick DeFile / Robert Dini6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-20vs Fee - BiellingWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Carpenter / Thomas Hargrove vs Nicholas Oglesby / Angelo Joseph6-3, 7-6
2025-08-13vs EFSC - ZavaletaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJustin Hertzog / Martin Rojas vs Alexandre de Chabert / James Combs6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Smith / Thomas Hargrove vs Dustin Hagy / Tareque Liaquat2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Benjamin Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Chad McCall
published 4
3.75
Justin Hertzog
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.74
Michael Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.47
Andrew Aronson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Martin Rojas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Chad Shoultz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Tony Famiano
published
3.15
Thomas Hargrove
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad McCall + Michael Carpenter6156% games+3.6% vs expected
Michael Carpenter + Justin Hertzog4160% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Hargrove + Michael Carpenter224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Carpenter + Tony Famiano123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Benjamin Smith
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Chad McCall
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
Justin Hertzog
32W–42L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Michael Carpenter
44W–47L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Andrew Aronson
12W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Martin Rojas
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Chad Shoultz
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
Tony Famiano
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.20
Thomas Hargrove
88W–115L career · 9 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.