Teams

Serve It Up

2022 DC WTA Singles · DC WTA Singles 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-17vs Net AssetsWon 21
W#1 SinglesKhoa Tran vs Chiraag Bains7-5, 4-2
L#2 SinglesAhmet Kilic vs Nick Fox3-6, 5-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesSamuel Fontanez vs Asa Elkins6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-10vs Net AssetsWon 20
W#1 SinglesKhoa Tran vs Chiraag Bains6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAhmet Kilic vs Michael Wasser6-4, 3-3
2022-08-28vs Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 SinglesKhoa Tran vs Asa Elkins6-2, 3-5
W#2 SinglesSamuel Fontanez vs Keith Jacobs6-3, 7-6
W#3 SinglesMike Sweet vs Olugbenga Okubadejo6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-08-27vs Net AssetsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAhmet Kilic vs Michael Wasser6-4, 5-2
W#2 SinglesAli Sajadi vs Mark Holt7-5, 5-3
2022-08-21vs Net AssetsLost 03
L#1 SinglesAli Sajadi vs Nick Fox1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSamuel Fontanez vs Asa Elkins2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesPeter Levine vs Keith Jacobs0-6, 1-6
2022-08-20vs Net AssetsSplit 11
W#2 SinglesAli Sajadi vs Keith Jacobs6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesMike Sweet vs Bradley Kesling3-6, 6-6
2022-08-13vs Net AssetsLost 02
L#1 SinglesAli Sajadi vs Chiraag Bains3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMike Sweet vs Michael Wasser3-6, 4-6
2022-07-30vs Net AssetsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAhmet Kilic vs Nick Fox3-6, 4-2
W#2 SinglesSamuel Fontanez vs Olugbenga Okubadejo6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · DC WTA Singles 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Serve It Up44131124218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Khoa Tran
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.31
Samuel Fontanez
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Ahmet Kilic
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Ali Sajadi
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.92
Mike Sweet
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Peter Levine
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Sweet + Samuel Fontanez224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Khoa Tran
29W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Samuel Fontanez
71W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Ahmet Kilic
7W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ali Sajadi
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Sweet
7W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.92
Peter Levine
9W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.