Teams

Harkleroad, Irene

2022 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 7.0 Combo - Women - 55

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-07-09vs Loepp, KathySplit 11
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Barnes / Carol Malarky vs Marcia Robertson / Patty Jensen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonetta Shaner / Vicky Vise vs Marilynn Wright / Diane Freeman6-7, 4-6
2022-06-25vs Ferguson, SusanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRonda Harness / Carol Malarky vs Gloria Dewey / Kim McRae3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKeyna Chertoff / Vicky Vise vs Virginia Davis / LaWanda Lamar3-6, 1-6
2022-06-18vs HOA/Herman/55&Over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesKeyna Chertoff / Connie Skeens vs Laura Cenedella / Karen Rogers1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeanne Cummings / Natalie Neal vs Julie Gibson / Marcia Moroney3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRonda Harness / Elizabeth Barnes vs Stephanie Gunderson / Eileen Joyce6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-11vs OConnor,KellySplit 11
L#2 DoublesRonda Harness / Nancy Ifft vs Paula Cartwright / Kelly OConnor3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKeyna Chertoff / Connie Skeens vs Mary Fendler / Irvilene Gardner6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-04vs Meigs, BarbaraLost 02
L#1 DoublesRonda Harness / Nancy Ifft vs Susan McConkey / Marly McMillen2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Barnes / Carolyn Steffen vs Candace Bickford / Deann Dunn4-6, 2-5
2022-05-21vs Kochersperger, CindyWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Altman / Carol Malarky vs Janet Crawford / Natalie Gillaspie6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesIrene Harkleroad / Donetta Shaner vs Cindy Kochersperger / Imelda Tooey2-6, 5-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Barnes / Nancy Ifft vs Beth Caffrey / Barb Ginavan7-6, 6-3
2022-05-14vs Murphy, SusanLost 03
L#1 DoublesIrene Harkleroad / Natalie Neal vs Dawn Forst / Mary Ball6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Altman / Donetta Shaner vs Debra Don / Lisa Erickson4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKeyna Chertoff / Connie Skeens vs Nancy Kitts / Ann Curtis1-6, 1-6
2020-08-22vs Kochersperger, CindyLost 02
L#2 DoublesYvonne Graf / Keyna Chertoff vs Lynn Sestak / Susan Winn0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesVicky Vise / Janet Gose vs Lynn Looloian / Barb Ginavan6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2020-08-15vs OConnor,KellyWon 10
W#2 DoublesEileen Grebowiec / Janet Shrewsbury vs Sherri Jackson / Barbara Laughlin0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-07-18vs Kochersperger, CindyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKeyna Chertoff / Kris Gronau vs Imelda Tooey / Barb Ginavan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2020-07-11vs OConnor,KellyLost 01
L#3 DoublesVicky Vise / Keyna Chertoff vs Gina Cappuzzo / Libby Julo3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Combo - Women - 55 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Natalie Neal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Ronda Harness
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Nancy Ifft
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Connie Skeens
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Donetta Shaner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Irene Harkleroad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Beth Childs
published
Carol Malarky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Carolyn Steffen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Shrewsbury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanne Cummings
published
Keyna Chertoff
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Sharon Altman
published
Vicky Vise
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Childs + Jeanne Cummings7460% games+1.7% vs expected
Ronda Harness + Nancy Ifft141350% games−3.8% vs expected
Keyna Chertoff + Connie Skeens7747% games−8.5% vs expected
Donetta Shaner + Irene Harkleroad2540% gamesnot enough data
Vicky Vise + Carol Malarky2449% gamesnot enough data
Irene Harkleroad + Vicky Vise1435% gamesnot enough data
Irene Harkleroad + Jeanne Cummings3253% gamesnot enough data
Irene Harkleroad + Keyna Chertoff044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Neal
77W–89L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Ronda Harness
57W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Nancy Ifft
71W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Connie Skeens
17W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Donetta Shaner
12W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Irene Harkleroad
14W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
Beth Childs
11W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Carol Malarky
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Carolyn Steffen
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Janet Shrewsbury
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jeanne Cummings
29W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Keyna Chertoff
15W–34L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Altman
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vicky Vise
10W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.