Teams

AKing/ASimeon (Queens)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 9.5 Men - Wed PM

14 players · average NTRP 4.78 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-15vs ABrandt/PEakin (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristopher Gardner / Alex King vs Andrew Schulz / Shivam Desai6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndre Simeon / Scott Gallimore vs Michael Szabo / Alexander Brandt4-6, 4-6
2025-10-08vs MWaleski/SWoodall (OPRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAndre Simeon / David Hager vs Christopher Dillon / Niclas Nilsson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Buffie / Depei Yu vs Charlie Reiney / Sam Dean3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSean Carmean / Corey Campbell vs Rob Haywood / Michael Waleski6-3, 6-2
2025-09-24vs ABrandt/PEakin (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesQuinn Carmean / Peter Tonon vs Pete Eakin / Guilherme Dumit6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlex King / Sean Carmean vs Michael Szabo / Shivam Desai6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDavid Hager / David Buffie vs Mathias Schmidt / Alexander Aucoin6-1, 7-6
2025-09-17vs MWaleski/SWoodall (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnatoly Zelepouga / George Lovitt vs Adam Tilly / Claes Persson7-6, 7-5
2025-09-10vs MGonzalez (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAndre Simeon / David Hager vs Frank Martin / Greg May6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlex King / Sean Carmean vs Ravi Mujumdar / Alex Durham7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesQuinn Carmean / Scott Gallimore vs Eric Winn / Alan Efremoff6-2, 6-4
2025-09-03vs ABrandt/PEakin (Queens)Won 21
W#1 DoublesDepei Yu / Andres Pazos vs Andrew Schulz / Shivam Desai6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristopher Gardner / David Hager vs Pete Eakin / Alexander Brandt6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSean Carmean / David Buffie vs Carlos Nolasco Moreno / Alexander Aucoin4-6, 4-6
2025-08-27vs MWaleski/SWoodall (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnatoly Zelepouga / David Hager vs Richard Merino / Kavir Kumar6-2, 6-2
2025-08-21vs MGonzalez (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAlex King / David Hager vs Ravi Mujumdar / Luke Laney6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPeter Tonon / Depei Yu vs Thomas Jeter / Diego Goya5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndre Simeon / Christian Hess vs Diego Gonzalez / Jonathan Parks6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 9.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.03
David Hager
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.96
Christian Hess
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.92
George Lovitt
published
4.87
Sean Carmean
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.71
Depei Yu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.61
Anatoly Zelepouga
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 5
4.55
Quinn Carmean
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.48
Peter Tonon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.39
Scott Gallimore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.37
Andre Simeon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.37
Andres Pazos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Corey Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Christopher Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.06
David Buffie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Carmean + David Hager404 matchesnot enough data
Andre Simeon + David Hager303 matchesnot enough data
Quinn Carmean + David Hager303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
David Hager
19W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
5.03
5
Christian Hess
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.96
George Lovitt
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.92
Sean Carmean
14W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.87
5
Depei Yu
11W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.71
5
Anatoly Zelepouga
217W–58L career · 8 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
Quinn Carmean
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.55
Peter Tonon
12W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
4.48
Scott Gallimore
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.39
4.5
Andre Simeon
24W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
4.37
5
Andres Pazos
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.37
4.5
Corey Campbell
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Gardner
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
David Buffie
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.