Teams

40 & Over 3.0X Murphy - NDB

2026 USTA Mixed 40 & Over League - NNM · 3.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-05-30vs 40 & Over 3.0X Sanchez - HPWon 21
W#1 DoublesGlenn Felty / Dawn Lorenz vs Junting Liu-Norrod / Glenn Goss6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesScott Stephens / K Joann Clemens vs Cynthia Schultz / Travis Hasse5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesArthur Shanks / Crystal Stein vs Susan Anderson / Aaron Brundage6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-05-18vs 40 & Over 3.0X Sanchez - HPLost 12
W#1 DoublesGlenn Felty / K Joann Clemens vs Dan Brandt / Sherri Smith6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJodi Holley / Arthur Shanks vs Cynthia Schultz / Travis Hasse2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSkip Adams / Ashley Adams vs Jennifer Dion / Theodore Lowe6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
K Joann Clemens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Dawn Lorenz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Jodi Holley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Crystal Stein
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.78
Arthur Shanks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Jeffrey Mortimer
published
2.71
Glenn Felty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Scott Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kami Bailey Perea
published
Skip Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kami Bailey Perea + Glenn Felty3349% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Holley + Scott Stephens044 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Holley + Glenn Felty123 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Holley + Jeffrey Mortimer303 matchesnot enough data
Kami Bailey Perea + Jeffrey Mortimer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

K Joann Clemens
98W–101L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Dawn Lorenz
27W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
Jodi Holley
136W–130L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Crystal Stein
107W–96L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Arthur Shanks
26W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
Jeffrey Mortimer
30W–13L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Glenn Felty
51W–76L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
Scott Stephens
29W–72L career · 1 line in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Kami Bailey Perea
51W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Skip Adams
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.