Teams

Laschober/Memphis

2026 Combo 55 & Over - Memphis · 8.5 55 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.12 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 13 12:00 PM
Leftwich Tennis Center
Sep 20 4:00 PM
Ridgeway Country Club
2026-08-30vs Schuler/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeana Templeton / Marta Schmitt vs Margo Gruen / Lee Anne Futrell4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWang-Ying Glasgow / Debbie Walker-Hulette vs Jenny Branston / Ginger Murdoch6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarla Goodwin / Shannon McCalla vs Dee Pitawanakwat / Lisa Burk0-6, 1-6
2026-08-25vs Schuler/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Laschober / Lil Rudd vs Patricia Dewey / Silvia Hecht4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarla Goodwin / Lori Jones vs Mary Ellen Mathews / Susan Ogg3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesWang-Ying Glasgow / Deana Templeton vs Ginger Murdoch / Debbie Ziebart6-1, 6-0
2026-08-16vs Schuler/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeanne Wilbourn / Perrin Hunter vs Lu Schneider / Caroline Delpriore1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLesley Grubbs / Sandy Maness vs Jenny Branston / Patricia Dewey7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWang-Ying Glasgow / Beth Austin vs Lisa Burk / Dee Pitawanakwat6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2026-08-09vs Schuler/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesAngie Tyner / Lesley Grubbs vs Margo Gruen / Lee Anne Futrell6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesShannon McCalla / Perrin Hunter vs Katharine Schuler / Mary Ellen Mathews1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Stuart / Marta Schmitt vs Lisa Burk / Silvia Hecht1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.5 55 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Schuler/Memphis1133644
2Laschober/Memphis1133762

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Marta Schmitt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.20
Wang-Ying Glasgow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Sandy Maness
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Shannon McCalla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.99
Angie Tyner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Jeanne Wilbourn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Lesley Grubbs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Debbie Walker-Hulette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Deana Templeton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Marla Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Beth Austin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Lil Rudd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Lynn Stuart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Kimberly Laschober
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Perrin Hunter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Stuart + Lesley Grubbs12554% games−2.3% vs expected
Lesley Grubbs + Beth Austin303 matchesnot enough data
Lesley Grubbs + Sandy Maness123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marta Schmitt
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
4.35
Wang-Ying Glasgow
24W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Sandy Maness
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
Shannon McCalla
24W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.00
4.5
Angie Tyner
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.99
Jeanne Wilbourn
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.91
Lesley Grubbs
51W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Debbie Walker-Hulette
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Deana Templeton
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Marla Goodwin
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Beth Austin
20W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Lil Rudd
17W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Lynn Stuart
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Kimberly Laschober
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
Perrin Hunter
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.