Teams

RCW - Ankeny

2023 Central Penn Tri-Level League · 5.0 Women Tri Level

6 players · average NTRP 4.38 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 5.0 Women Tri Level have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Amy Ankeny
published 5
4.34
Laura Athey
published 4.5
3.84
Bonnie Westheaffer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.80
Audrey Lubas
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Carrie Moyer
published
Patricia Bryner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Bryner + Laura Athey5170% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Moyer + Amy Ankeny4163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amy Ankeny
44W–30L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.71
4.5
Laura Athey
124W–39L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
4.34
4
Bonnie Westheaffer
152W–134L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Audrey Lubas
113W–114L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Carrie Moyer
20W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Bryner
24W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.