Teams

Fling Double Trouble

2022 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-13vs Tuplano- TBCLost 02
L#2 DoublesMatthew Fling / Michael Streater vs Jov Tuplano / David Rasmussen2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Smetana / Rob Stahley vs Wilfert Long / Charles Sunderland3-6, 1-6
2022-06-29vs Hess PuppWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Smetana / Rob Stahley vs Bill Book / Emanuel Diaz7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-22vs Cooper/Crofut BoBsLost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Gebell / Rob Stahley vs Tony Alschlager / Philip Jenkins4-6, 4-6
2022-06-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesRob Stahley / John Smetana vs James Roth / David Mashaal6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-08vs Jossi-TennisLost 01
L#1 DoublesStefan Lucyk / Rob Stahley vs William Schiller / Michael Tennis4-6, 2-6
2022-05-25vs Hassenstab - Fed ExpressSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMichael Streater vs Jonas Nygard6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoseph Marnell / Rob Stahley vs Robert Munoz / Jeffrey Brecht4-6, 3-6
2022-05-18vs Ellsworth PadawansSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMichael Streater vs Dale Lokkesmoe6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesThomas Gebell / Rob Stahley vs Timothy Finnerty / Arlie Fundaun1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-05-11vs Zehren - version 2.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTom Larson / Rob Stahley vs Douglas Zehren / Wade Martinson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichael Streater vs Justin Miller2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Sae Yoon
published
3.47
Tom Larson
published
3.43
Michael Streater
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.26
Jim Sandor
published
3.18
Taras Karkoc
published
3.15
Stefan Lucyk
published
3.14
Rob Stahley
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
John Smetana
published
2.79
Matthew Fling
published
Joseph Marnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Streater + Tom Larson6164% games+7.3% vs expected
Matthew Fling + John Smetana0623% games−6.7% vs expected
Stefan Lucyk + Taras Karkoc314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sae Yoon
40W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
Tom Larson
26W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
Michael Streater
158W–102L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
Jim Sandor
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Taras Karkoc
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Stefan Lucyk
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Rob Stahley
17W–37L career · 8 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
John Smetana
1W–35L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
2.81
Matthew Fling
6W–51L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.79
Joseph Marnell
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.