Teams

IHCC-COHEN 4.0L

2023 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · 4.0 Low Women Night Wednesday

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Low Women Night Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Hannah Grossman
published
3.74
Beth Cohen
published 4
3.65
Nancy Honeycutt
published
3.58
Michelle Lisenby
published
3.58
Miriam Smith
published
3.55
Caroline Childs
published 4
3.54
Kimberly Faulkner
published
3.49
Molly Sexton
published
3.46
Anna Barnes
published 4
3.38
Kristen Prosperi
published
3.36
Jan Slocumb
published
3.32
Meredith Covert
published
3.27
Tarver Perry
published
Mindy Minei
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Covert + Caroline Childs6058% games+12.7% vs expected
Anna Barnes + Caroline Childs134 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Faulkner + Miriam Smith303 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Covert + Miriam Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Grossman
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
4.39
4
Beth Cohen
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
Nancy Honeycutt
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.65
Michelle Lisenby
13W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
Miriam Smith
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Caroline Childs
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kimberly Faulkner
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Molly Sexton
31W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
4
Anna Barnes
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
Kristen Prosperi
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
Jan Slocumb
33W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
Meredith Covert
25W–10L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.32
Tarver Perry
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.27
Mindy Minei
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.