Teams

Halstead - Byrd/Panter

2023 Adult 55 & Over-GC · Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Eileen Panter
published
3.79
Marie Klusman
published
3.72
Dianne Holloway
published 4
3.70
Erin Walsh
published
3.68
Nancy Howell
published
3.57
Candace McCarty
published 4
3.57
John Panter
published
3.49
Amanda Letonoff
published 4
3.44
Phyllis Shoemake
published
3.35
Lynette Cooper
published
3.13
Reuben Byrd
published
3.05
Jan Salloum
published
Michelle Foley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Klusman + Erin Walsh11362% games+8.1% vs expected
Dianne Holloway + Lynette Cooper18169% games+7.9% vs expected
Nancy Howell + Eileen Panter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eileen Panter
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
Marie Klusman
40W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Dianne Holloway
49W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Erin Walsh
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Nancy Howell
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Candace McCarty
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
John Panter
32W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
4
Amanda Letonoff
32W–18L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Phyllis Shoemake
19W–9L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.44
Lynette Cooper
42W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.35
Reuben Byrd
30W–64L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jan Salloum
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Michelle Foley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.