Teams

Kinchen/55/Div2/WD/CCLA

2025 BR Tri-Level 55 & Over - Women Day · 4.0,3.5,3.0 BR (55&O) Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.83 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 BR (55&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Tina Moore
published
3.75
Dana Lanoix
published 4
3.75
Becky Davis
published 4
3.75
Marieke Crawford
published
3.46
Stephanie Kurzweg
published
3.46
Lynn Brignac
published
3.42
Leslie Houser
published
3.42
Lori Kinchen
published
3.41
Cheryl Moreaux
published 3.5
3.40
Randi Peltier
published
3.34
Shawn Mills
published
3.33
Jenny Rome
published
3.16
TIne Neames
published
2.91
Rondi Cowart
published
2.78
Terri Baldwin
published
2.77
Terre Smith
published
2.68
Shelli St Romain
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rondi Cowart + Terre Smith5163% games+11.9% vs expected
Tina Moore + Becky Davis5453% games+2.7% vs expected
Shelli St Romain + Terre Smith2540% games−1.7% vs expected
Dana Lanoix + Becky Davis2349% games−2.0% vs expected
Leslie Houser + Becky Davis4167% gamesnot enough data
Lori Kinchen + Stephanie Kurzweg044 matchesnot enough data
Marieke Crawford + Becky Davis224 matchesnot enough data
Tina Moore + Randi Peltier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Moore
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Dana Lanoix
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Becky Davis
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Marieke Crawford
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Stephanie Kurzweg
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Lynn Brignac
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Leslie Houser
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.42
Lori Kinchen
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Cheryl Moreaux
22W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Randi Peltier
24W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Shawn Mills
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.34
Jenny Rome
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
TIne Neames
31W–33L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Rondi Cowart
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
Terri Baldwin
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Terre Smith
23W–25L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Shelli St Romain
11W–22L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.