Teams

OVP/Dean L-2

2024 COTA Mixed Tri-level Winter 2023 (non-advancing) · Flight II- 7.0, 7.5, 8.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Flight II- 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Matthew Howard
published
Andy Reagin
published 4
3.70
Rebecca Rea
published
3.52
Kebby Holden
published
3.42
Angela Alexander
published 4
3.36
Pamela Leed
published
3.27
Melissa Harshman
published
Cindi Sartain
published 3.5
3.20
Elizabeth Sadler
published
3.20
Mike Barr
published
3.15
Gable Peacock
published
3.15
William Culpepper
published
3.14
Sonya Peacock
published
3.01
Wanda Beard
published
3.01
Ronald Rice
published
3.00
Wendell Beard
published
2.98
Debbie Culpepper
published 3
2.50
Cheryl Dean
published 3
Erin Lovett
published
Kathryn Rice
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Rea + Matthew Howard11069% games+14.4% vs expected
Ronald Rice + Kathryn Rice1437% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Culpepper + William Culpepper213 matchesnot enough data
Gable Peacock + Sonya Peacock303 matchesnot enough data
Wanda Beard + Wendell Beard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Howard
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Andy Reagin
1W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Rea
58W–22L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Kebby Holden
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Angela Alexander
13W–36L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
Pamela Leed
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Melissa Harshman
65W–27L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Cindi Sartain
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elizabeth Sadler
3W–15L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.20
Mike Barr
25W–15L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Gable Peacock
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
William Culpepper
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.15
Sonya Peacock
67W–35L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Wanda Beard
24W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
Ronald Rice
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Wendell Beard
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Debbie Culpepper
11W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Cheryl Dean
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
Erin Lovett
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathryn Rice
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.