Teams

C.LeLiever

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-01vs M.ARaperCBraswellSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKatie Landi / Ferebee Plyler vs Julia Bethune / Caroline Braswell0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChristina LeLiever / Sheri Erhart vs Shannon Cassell / Abbie Williamson6-2, 6-3
2023-04-24vs B.Robinson 2.5 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTucker Andrews / Stephanie Sneeden vs Brittany Robinson / Laura Yates3-6, 3-6
2023-04-17vs K.BlevinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesFerebee Plyler / Lydia Anders vs Nicole Nemmers / Sarah Ammirati6-3, 6-3
2023-03-27vs S.King 2.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesTucker Andrews / Lydia Anders vs Kelly Thompson / Jana Inman6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSheri Erhart vs Susan Potter6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesIhrie Wood / Ferebee Plyler vs Connie Dimitroff / Diane Bosnjak King6-2, 6-0
2023-03-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Sneeden / Tucker Andrews vs Shannon Parsons / Tracy Stillwell7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-13Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSheri Erhart vs Lauren Smith4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Ferebee Plyler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Sarah Newton
published
2.99
Ihrie Wood
published
2.58
Sheri Erhart
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.37
Tucker Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Katie Landi
published
2.18
Stephanie Sneeden
published
2.17
Hollan Young
published
2.13
Ashleigh Black
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashleigh Black + Tucker Andrews033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ferebee Plyler
87W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.61
Sarah Newton
18W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
Ihrie Wood
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Christina LeLiever
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Sheri Erhart
18W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58
2.5
Tucker Andrews
44W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%83%17%
2.37
Katie Landi
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19
Stephanie Sneeden
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
Hollan Young
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Ashleigh Black
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.