Teams

FWBTC-McManus

2024 OWB Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-06vs BlueWater Bay-HughesLost 02
L#1 DoublesCherie Tan / Donna Ansell vs Tami Groth / Virginia Ballard4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDodi Stringfellow vs Amanda Nielsen2-6, 1-6
2024-03-23vs BlueWater Bay-HughesLost 01
L#1 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Melanie Schweizer vs Van Hughes / Alicia Roberson6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Tonya Pfeifle vs Mary Mullen / Kimberly Mathers6-3, 7-6
2024-02-24vs BlueWater Bay-HughesWon 10
W#1 DoublesCherie Tan / Melanie Schweizer vs Van Hughes / Jamie Swierzbin6-2, 6-2
2024-02-10vs BlueWater Bay-HughesWon 20
W#1 SinglesDodi Stringfellow vs Jamie Swierzbin1-0
W#2 DoublesCherie Tan / Tonya Pfeifle vs Alicia Roberson / Caroline Segovia7-5, 6-1
2024-02-03vs BlueWater Bay-HughesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Cherie Tan vs Van Hughes / Kimberly Mathers6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTonya Pfeifle vs Amanda Nielsen2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Mikaela McManus
published
3.79
Tonya Pfeifle
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Sophie Rudman
published
3.58
Rene Abel
published 3.5
3.49
Melanie Schweizer
published
3.41
Cherie Tan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Dodi Stringfellow
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
Kris Pritchard
published
Maria Hicks
published
Patricia Leahy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dodi Stringfellow + Tonya Pfeifle6354% games+10.7% vs expected
Cherie Tan + Dodi Stringfellow361560% games−5.5% vs expected
Cherie Tan + Tonya Pfeifle404 matchesnot enough data
Cherie Tan + Rene Abel404 matchesnot enough data
Tonya Pfeifle + Rene Abel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mikaela McManus
81W–44L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Tonya Pfeifle
154W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Sophie Rudman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Rene Abel
122W–57L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.58
Melanie Schweizer
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Cherie Tan
146W–59L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Dodi Stringfellow
120W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Kris Pritchard
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Hicks
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Leahy
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.