Teams

RCC GREEN

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-01vs LAC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesChrissy Hasek / Emily Miller vs Christy Hilmas / MARY WEISFOUT6-1, 6-0
2023-07-25vs NJ ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Miller / Chrissy Hasek vs Karen Stanley / Heather Roberts6-2, 6-0
2023-07-04vs NJ ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Miller / Chrissy Hasek vs Shirley Willard / Karen Stanley6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Chrissy Hasek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Sara Wang
published
2.76
2.68
Rilla Baca
published
2.60
Alana MacY
published 3
2.34
Mandy Sutton
published
Christina Sjolin
published 2.5
2.22
Heather Huelsman
published
1.82
Tracy Zahner
published
Meghan Bigelow
published
Piper Connelly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Wang + Alana MacY303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chrissy Hasek
85W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
Sara Wang
24W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Catherine Dansdill
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
Rilla Baca
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Alana MacY
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Mandy Sutton
25W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Christina Sjolin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Heather Huelsman
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.22
Tracy Zahner
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Meghan Bigelow
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Piper Connelly
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.