Teams

NWW-MI-Sims

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.45 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-11vs BC-ClementeWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlan Mitchel / William Chapman vs Gordon Kamisar / David Hasbrook6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCharles Naden / Mark Sinkey vs Steven Rogers / Terry Lundeen6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMatthew Rudolf / Gregory Norden vs Clifford Weiss / David Tan6-2, 6-2
2025-06-02vs NWW-AYTC-DoddLost 12
W#1 DoublesWilliam Chapman / Alan Mitchel vs Larry Bienenfeld / Vincent Yee6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCharles Naden / Mark Sinkey vs Douglas Scott / Ken Faith5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Bove / Gary Pollastro vs Richard Bienenfeld / Steve Lang3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-30vs TCSP-Phillips 2025Won 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam Chapman / Matthew Rudolf vs William Brown / Alexander Friedrich6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCharles Naden / Gary Pollastro vs Wayne Kindsvogel / Michael Newman6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Bove / Scott Thomson vs Rick Friedhoff / Robert Bennett6-3, 7-5
2025-05-21vs HBSQ-Henninger/StrongSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMichael Bove / Sanjiv Parikh vs Mark Henninger / Craig Lundgren6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Gluck / Gary Pollastro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-15vs CP-Viriththamulla 7.0MWon 21
L#1 DoublesGary Pollastro / Gregory Norden vs Thomas Lynch / Gamage Viriththamulla6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Naden / Mark Sinkey vs Steve Carl / Walt Paulson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Bove / Alan Mitchel vs Erik Gunvaldson / Robert Shen7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-08vs MC-Sato M 7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesGeoff Lieberman / Bob Sims vs Michael Carlson / Peter Sefton1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Naden / Mark Sinkey vs Frank Hammer / Seth Fulcher7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Bove / William Chapman vs Mike Gilkey / Neil Price6-3, 6-4
2025-04-30vs CAC/SL-Silverados-GascoigneWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Bove / Mark Sinkey vs Mariano Ortiz Jr / Mark Waldron6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCharles Naden / William Chapman vs Robert Gascoigne / Martin Sullivan7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Gluck / Bob Sims vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-22vs BETC-S. IkedaWon 21
L#1 DoublesBob Sims / Charles Naden vs Steve Ikeda / Daniel Benoit6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Chapman / Mark Sinkey vs Bill Houser / Scott Gunderson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Bove / Sanjiv Parikh vs Bruce Colley / Patrick Mason6-3, 6-2
2025-04-16vs HBSQ-AdeeWon 21
L#1 DoublesSanjiv Parikh / Geoff Lieberman vs Paul Lorring / Kenny Kramer3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Naden / William Chapman vs Jim Coghlan / Bruce Adee6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAlan Mitchel / Michael Bove vs George Sampson / Nicholas Giordano6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Alan Mitchel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.46
William Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.33
Charles Naden
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Mark Sinkey
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.25
Gary Pollastro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Bob Sims
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Scott Thomson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Sanjiv Parikh
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Michael Bove
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.11
Gregory Norden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.69
Geoff Lieberman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Matthew Rudolf
published
Michael Gluck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Bove + Scott Thomson9353% games−1.2% vs expected
Mark Sinkey + William Chapman6157% gamesnot enough data
Mark Sinkey + Charles Naden3257% gamesnot enough data
William Chapman + Charles Naden4163% gamesnot enough data
Gary Pollastro + Scott Thomson044 matchesnot enough data
Mark Sinkey + Gary Pollastro213 matchesnot enough data
Geoff Lieberman + Gregory Norden123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Bove + Gregory Norden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alan Mitchel
15W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.69
William Chapman
36W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Charles Naden
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Mark Sinkey
29W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Gary Pollastro
27W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bob Sims
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Scott Thomson
29W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Sanjiv Parikh
33W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Michael Bove
42W–31L career · 8 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Gregory Norden
21W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Geoff Lieberman
33W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.69
Matthew Rudolf
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Gluck
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.