Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Gardner-WN/SU

2024 Team Singles Fall · SGV - Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-30vs SGC Chow Fun-Arroyo HS/SU12Won 20
W#2 SinglesPam Barbato vs Josephine Chow6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMay Low vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesPam Barbato vs Christy Loun Pruszynski6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJill Jobran vs Jean Oh6-3, 6-3
2024-10-27vs SGV LFG-Gruaz-Flint Cyn/SA12Split 11
L#2 SinglesPam Barbato vs Antoinette Lessuk5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesSandra Zane vs Sandy Mandel6-4, 6-4
2024-10-20vs SGC Chow Fun-Arroyo HS/SU12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesPam Barbato vs Kathy Wilkinson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJill Jobran vs Grace Eleyae6-7, 5-7
W#3 SinglesPam Barbato vs Lisa Hawkins6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSandra Zane vs Rachel Brereton3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesPam Barbato vs Jean Oh4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPam Barbato vs Sean Ky6-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMay Low vs Jing Feng6-3, 6-1
2024-09-21vs SGV LFG-Gruaz-Flint Cyn/SA12Won 10
W#2 SinglesJill Jobran vs Nancy Pashayan6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Jill Jobran
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Nancy Ray
published
3.38
Shannon Koeppen
published
3.31
Pam Barbato
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.22
Rebecca Berman
published
3.12
Joanna Gardner
published
3.09
Terry Meng
published
3.03
Sandra Zane
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
May Low
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Zane + Pam Barbato2642% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jill Jobran
171W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
Nancy Ray
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Shannon Koeppen
29W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
3.5
Pam Barbato
100W–64L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Rebecca Berman
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Joanna Gardner
29W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.12
Terry Meng
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Sandra Zane
146W–141L career · 2 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
May Low
28W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.