Teams

CDTA W 55&OM7.0 6.MTB Castriano Sat 4 $27

CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W · E

16 players · average NTRP 3.45 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesAlex Paz / Ronald Schwartz vs Chad Anderson / Matt Newman1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRonald Sklare / Thomas Stotter vs Barry Gork / Alan Mesh6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Lesser / Ronald Schwartz vs John Compton / John Schaefer6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPaul Lesser / Anthony Fiordaliso vs James Albertone / Brian Washa2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRonald Schwartz / Richard Foss vs Jim Fine / Marc Pelini6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesScott Smith / Ronald Sklare vs Stephen Burriesci / Kevin Lydon0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Stuparitz / Ronald Schwartz vs Jon Erickson / Andy Knott3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHoward Braun / Paul Lesser vs Shiv Baloo / Eric Esancy4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRonald Schwartz / Thomas Stotter vs Robert Barry / Phil Frederickson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHoward Braun / Ronald Schwartz vs Steve Franks / John van Duzer6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMark Juhl / Ronald Sklare vs Richard Rykhus / Joe Morton7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesRonald Sklare / Paul Leyderman vs Shawn Erickson / Parker Turnipseed6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMitchell Weinstein / Paul Lesser vs David Meltz / Shen Zheng6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesWilliam Strickley / Mitchell Weinstein vs Richard McLean / Sean Conboy4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Foss / John Stuparitz vs Rocky Colletti / Bob King4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OM7.0 3.Tam Woods Sun 11 $2212233921242
2CDTA W 55&OM7.0 5.Naper Esancy Sun 6:30 $2412234824276
3CDTA W 55&OM7.0 7.Wheat Mills Sun 2 $2077202248341
4CDTA W 55&OM7.0 6.MTB Castriano Sat 4 $2768202246378
5CDTA W 55&OM7.0 8.HF Janzen Sun 3:30 $2268162656380
6CDTA W 55&OM7.0 4.Tam Robbie Sun 11 $2259172557387
7CDTA W 55&OM7.0 2.RT Peroussanov Sat 8 $2759152759424
8CDTA W 55&OM7.0 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5311132962382

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Anthony Fiordaliso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Cliff Breslow
published 3.5
3.42
Paul Leyderman
published 3.5
3.40
Mark Juhl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Howard Braun
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Ronald Sklare
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Thomas Stotter
published 3.5
Alex Paz
published 3.5
DAVID ALTMAN
published 3.5
3.17
Mitchell Weinstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
John Stuparitz
published 3.5
3.00
Richard Foss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
2.58
Brian Hagaman
published 3
Joseph Castriano
published
Ronald Schwartz
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Foss + Paul Leyderman3353% games+5.5% vs expected
John Stuparitz + William Strickley7456% games+2.1% vs expected
Richard Foss + William Strickley41641% games−1.6% vs expected
William Strickley + Howard Braun2849% games−1.8% vs expected
Mitchell Weinstein + Howard Braun5849% games−4.7% vs expected
John Stuparitz + Howard Braun81147% games−5.8% vs expected
Richard Foss + Howard Braun3547% games−8.6% vs expected
Richard Foss + John Stuparitz91048% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Fiordaliso
16W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Cliff Breslow
43W–39L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Paul Leyderman
151W–147L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
Mark Juhl
24W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Howard Braun
60W–96L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Ronald Sklare
15W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Thomas Stotter
52W–32L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Alex Paz
20W–43L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
DAVID ALTMAN
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mitchell Weinstein
48W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
John Stuparitz
37W–40L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Richard Foss
65W–116L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
William Strickley
116W–134L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Brian Hagaman
14W–28L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Joseph Castriano
24W–28L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ronald Schwartz
6W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.