Teams

Needs Sets

2025 FW Combo Tournament · 8.5 Ladies

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-25vs AlbusLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrooke Cabianca / Caryn Angus vs Kerry Schonwald / Mariajose Alvarez6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Hodnick / Eleonor Belanger vs Elise Jeffery / Kera Watts3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKate VandeBerghe / Heather Vik vs Teresa Albus / Kimberly Grogan6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-25vs ApostleWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrooke Hodnick / Caryn Angus vs Areli Martinez / Sandi Shipley6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesErin Piel / Heather Vik vs Priscilla Schimming / Grace Sherouse3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJody Hassemer / Leslie Eugenio vs Tamara Murer / Laura Locke4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-24vs BadenLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Vik / Brooke Cabianca vs Katherine Smith / Alyssa Bauer3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEleonor Belanger / Kate VandeBerghe vs Meredith Weckel / Kayleigh Holt2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKarin Fisher / Erin Piel vs Caroline Baden / Susan Huber6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Brooke Hodnick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Kate VandeBerghe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.18
Brooke Cabianca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Kenda Bevill
published
4.03
Jody Hassemer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Erin Piel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Heather Vik
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Christina Perron
published 4
3.70
Leslie Eugenio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Caryn Angus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eleonor Belanger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Cabianca + Kate VandeBerghe271055% games+3.9% vs expected
Kate VandeBerghe + Kenda Bevill0743% games−14.4% vs expected
Brooke Hodnick + Jody Hassemer404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brooke Hodnick
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
4.32
Kate VandeBerghe
77W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Brooke Cabianca
28W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
Kenda Bevill
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
Jody Hassemer
26W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
Erin Piel
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.96
Heather Vik
32W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Christina Perron
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Leslie Eugenio
25W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Caryn Angus
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Eleonor Belanger
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.