Teams

Eagle Harbor - Jones

2026 Duval Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 W Sunday

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-06vs Palencia - JimenezLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Holley / Lori Mercer vs Lanay Gearhart / Kimberly Maxwell6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErica Washkill / Jill Schmidt vs Laura Jimenez / Anai Tipton3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSheri Woods / Nancy Simmons vs Debbie Rodrigues / Michelle Meyer-Devlin6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-16vs Jax Beach - WatersWon 21
L#1 DoublesKandee Townsend / Nancy Simmons vs Rosemarie Prokop / Tina Toomey4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Schermerhorn / Deana Jones vs Anne DeWeese / Elizabeth McLaughlin6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJill Schmidt / Pam Fritz vs Virginia Waters / Kari Dodak6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-09vs Yards - ErenbergLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Holley / Stephanie Rouse vs Susan Marie Thornton HOLLIDAY / Melinda Marchesi6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSheri Woods / Nancy Simmons vs Beth McCann / Debra Tewey7-5, 1-2
W#3 DoublesDaiva Nixon / Kellie Philips vs Donna Erenberg / Monica Barrett7-5, 6-3
2026-07-26vs Southside - AtkinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJolene Hamel / Daiva Nixon vs Staci Hill / Tracy Hodges2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDeana Jones / Kristen Schermerhorn vs Vicki Carden / Dixie McDaniel de Andrade6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPam Fritz / Annabelle Matias vs Karen Hartzell / Donna Hayes6-1, 6-2
2026-07-19vs Palencia - JimenezWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Holley / Lori Mercer vs Doris Beaton / Dawn Johnson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJolene Hamel / Daiva Nixon vs Rita Geronimo / Laura Jimenez1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAimee Davidow / Erica Washkill vs Valerie Dolan / KATHY COLLINS7-5, 7-6
2026-07-12vs Eagle Landing - BrinkWon 20
W#2 DoublesKandee Townsend / Erica Washkill vs Kathy Evans / Diane Forhan6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKristen Schermerhorn / Deana Jones vs Kelly Bryant / PATSY REYNOLDS6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Gail Olsen
published 3.5
3.29
Kandee Townsend
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Aimee Davidow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Mary Holley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Jill Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Kristen Schermerhorn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Nancy Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Annabelle Matias
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Jolene Hamel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Sheri Woods
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Pam Fritz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Daiva Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Deana Jones
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Lori Mercer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Stephanie Rouse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Erica Washkill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kellie Philips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kandee Townsend + Gail Olsen3350% games−7.6% vs expected
Lori Mercer + Mary Holley314 matchesnot enough data
Kandee Townsend + Lori Mercer213 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Schermerhorn + Gail Olsen303 matchesnot enough data
Mary Holley + Gail Olsen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gail Olsen
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
Kandee Townsend
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Aimee Davidow
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
Mary Holley
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Jill Schmidt
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Kristen Schermerhorn
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
Nancy Simmons
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Annabelle Matias
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
Jolene Hamel
15W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
Sheri Woods
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
Pam Fritz
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Daiva Nixon
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Deana Jones
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Lori Mercer
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
Stephanie Rouse
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Erica Washkill
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Kellie Philips
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.