Teams

PD 4.0M 40 & Over (Snyder)

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over - PD · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-06vs PD40/Braddock/FTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLarry Rizzo / Edwin Padgett vs Bryan Braddock / Allen Brown6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBryan Snipes vs Kirk Watari6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCris Averette / Kristopher Lilly vs Tony Johnson / Daniel Smith6-4, 6-0
2026-03-23vs PD40/Braddock/FTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Rogers / Calvin Battle vs Bryan Braddock / Leroy Scott Washington6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKyle Gunter vs Kirk Watari4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBryan Snipes / Kristopher Lilly vs Ling Wu / William Echandy Gierbolini6-4, 6-3
2026-03-09vs PD40/Braddock/FTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLarry Rizzo / Edwin Padgett vs Ling Wu / Allen Brown6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBryan Snipes vs Kirk Watari6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristopher Lilly / Neil Lane vs Tony Johnson / Daniel Smith7-6, 6-3
2026-03-02vs PD40/Braddock/FTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristopher Lilly / Bryan Snipes vs Allen Brown / Soon Hwang7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCris Averette / Marian Popa vs Tony Johnson / Bryan Braddock6-1, 6-1
2026-02-23vs PD40/Braddock/FTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristopher Lilly / Neil Lane vs William Echandy Gierbolini / Tony Johnson6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBryan Snipes vs Kirk Watari3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Rogers / Calvin Battle vs Daniel Smith / Ling Wu7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PD 4.0M 40 & Over (Snyder)4119613143
2PD40/Braddock/FTC1442143285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Kyle Gunter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.88
Andrew Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Edwin Padgett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Larry Rizzo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Bryan Snipes
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.55
Calvin Battle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Kristopher Lilly
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.49
Frederick Estep
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Cris Averette
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Tom Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marian Popa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Neil Lane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Rogers + Calvin Battle314 matchesnot enough data
Edwin Padgett + Larry Rizzo303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle Gunter
12W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Andrew Rogers
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.88
Edwin Padgett
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Larry Rizzo
7W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Bryan Snipes
27W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Calvin Battle
19W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kristopher Lilly
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Frederick Estep
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Cris Averette
21W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Tom Snyder
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Marian Popa
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Neil Lane
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.