Teams

Freeman/Spearman 4.0-Woodlands Parks

2025 Adult 18 & Over 2.5 - 4.5 NoHo Men · 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-13vs Wideman 4.0 - Woodlands ParksWon 20
W#1 DoublesMICHAEL SPEARMAN / Francisco Malpica vs Paul Abokhair / Darrel Thorson3-1
W#2 DoublesRaymond Martinez / Gerardo Palencia vs Kevin Campbell / Robert Kane3-2
2025-07-13vs Wideman 4.0 - Woodlands ParksSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMICHAEL SPEARMAN / Francisco Malpica vs Paul Abokhair / Darrel Thorson8-4
L#2 DoublesGerardo Palencia / Raymond Martinez vs Robert Kane / Kevin Campbell8-9
L#1 DoublesShrirang Deshmukh / Chris Micklitz vs James Wooten / Federico Marques1-2
W#1 SinglesKelly Sandel vs Juan Paulino8-0
W#2 DoublesRicardo Palencia / Gerardo Palencia vs Bethuel Gabriel / Doug Speers3-2
L#2 SinglesMichael Drake vs Michael Salinas3-4
W#3 DoublesFrancisco Malpica / Phillip Wills vs Geber Urbina / Robert McGlashan3-1
W#1 DoublesHugo Gerardo Palencia Ferrer / Chris Micklitz vs James Wooten / Federico Marques9-8
W#1 SinglesKelly Sandel vs Juan Paulino8-0
W#2 DoublesRicardo Palencia / Gerardo Palencia vs Bethuel Gabriel / Doug Speers8-6
L#2 SinglesMichael Drake vs Michael Salinas6-8
W#3 DoublesFrancisco Malpica / James Robinson vs Geber Urbina / Robert McGlashan8-4
W#1 DoublesAndrew Kwan / Kelly Sandel vs Doug Speers / Robert McGlashan8-1
L#1 SinglesBlanton Hansen vs Bethuel Gabriel2-2
L#2 DoublesShrirang Deshmukh / Chris Micklitz vs James Wooten / Federico Marques8-9
W#1 DoublesAndrew Kwan / Kelly Sandel vs Doug Speers / Robert McGlashan8-3
W#1 SinglesJames Burks vs Wang Zhang8-2
W#2 DoublesShrirang Deshmukh / Chris Micklitz vs James Wooten / Federico Marques9-8
2025-06-14vs Wideman 4.0 - Woodlands ParksWon 31
L#1 DoublesRaymond Martinez / Ricardo Palencia vs Kevin Campbell / Robert Kane6-8
W#1 SinglesJames Burks vs Ethan Lammayot8-0
W#2 DoublesChad Harris / Hugo Gerardo Palencia Ferrer vs Cooper Borski / Blake Freeman8-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Kwan / MICHAEL SPEARMAN vs Chris Wideman / Bruce Inting8-1
2025-06-14vs Wideman 4.0 - Woodlands ParksWon 31
L#1 DoublesRaymond Martinez / Ricardo Palencia vs Kevin Campbell / Robert Kane4-5
W#1 SinglesJames Burks vs Ethan Lammayot8-0
W#2 DoublesChad Harris / Hugo Gerardo Palencia Ferrer vs Cooper Borski / Blake Freeman8-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Kwan / Phillip Wills vs Chris Wideman / Bruce Inting4-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Blanton Hansen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Andrew Kwan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Phillip Wills
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Chris Micklitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.88
MICHAEL SPEARMAN
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Chad Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.69
Hugo Gerardo Palencia Ferrer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Francisco Malpica
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Gerardo Palencia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
James Burks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kelly Sandel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Michael Drake
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Raymond Martinez
published
Ricardo Palencia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Shrirang Deshmukh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tyler Freeman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Burks + Chad Harris303 matchesnot enough data
Hugo Gerardo Palencia Ferrer + Chad Harris213 matchesnot enough data
Shrirang Deshmukh + Chris Micklitz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Blanton Hansen
31W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Andrew Kwan
32W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
Phillip Wills
16W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
4.5
Chris Micklitz
38W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.91
MICHAEL SPEARMAN
27W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.88
4.5
Chad Harris
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.72
Hugo Gerardo Palencia Ferrer
40W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.69
Francisco Malpica
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gerardo Palencia
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
James Burks
24W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Sandel
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Drake
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raymond Martinez
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ricardo Palencia
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shrirang Deshmukh
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Freeman
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.