Teams

1 Woodlake Laroche

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-04vs 6 Bon Air Girl PowersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJenny Jolinski / Sandra Bavaro vs Karen Scherzer / Shelli Fenstermacher6-3, 6-2
2023-06-01vs 5 ACAC Tandett Courting DangerWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandra Bavaro / Lisa Elliott vs Jen Waller / Jessica Cox4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-27vs 11 Avalon GhitaLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Elliott / Sandra Bavaro vs Jeanne Oostdyk / TONYA URQUHART0-6, 6-7
2023-05-06vs 2 Raintree BryanLost 01
L#1 DoublesVirginia Patterson / Sandra Bavaro vs Jean Cheek / Kerry Kablack4-6, 3-6
2023-04-16Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSandra Bavaro vs Lauren King5-7, 3-6
2023-04-15vs 21 ACAC Blackburn/RosaWon 10
W#1 SinglesSandra Bavaro vs Rosita Torres6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Blanka White
published 3
2.87
Virginia Patterson
published
2.84
Sandra Bavaro
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Wendy Learn
published
2.80
Allie Hannon
published 3
2.65
Suzanne Snyder
published
2.61
Wanda Huggins
published
2.52
Jenny Jolinski
published
Jasmine Kaur
published
Kathleen Laroche
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allie Hannon + Wendy Learn3252% games+6.0% vs expected
Jenny Jolinski + Virginia Patterson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Blanka White
34W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.21
Virginia Patterson
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87
Sandra Bavaro
128W–124L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
Wendy Learn
24W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Allie Hannon
27W–39L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Suzanne Snyder
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
2.65
Wanda Huggins
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
2.61
Jenny Jolinski
9W–21L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
2.52
Jasmine Kaur
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Laroche
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.