Teams

Camden

2021 VA Beach Adult 40 & Over Tennis Patrons · VA Beach Patron's Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-31vs Lee/PowersWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Camden / Stacey Baum vs Lucy Newman / Kara McCaa6-0, 6-1
2021-07-29vs Lee/PowersLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacey Baum / Betty Domanski vs Lori Cox / Perry DiBona3-6, 2-6
2021-07-22vs Lee/PowersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Cowen / Stacey Baum vs Marguerite Lee / Megan Bradshaw7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErin Camden vs Sylvia Mapp6-1, 6-4
2021-07-08vs Lee/PowersWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacey Baum / Betty Domanski vs Faye Downey / Jennifer Kamarek6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErin Camden / Christine Cowen vs Marguerite Lee / Courtney Morrall7-5, 6-3
2021-07-01vs Lee/PowersWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Camden / Betty Domanski vs Marguerite Lee / Amy Lehmkuhler6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStacey Baum / Michele Partridge-Lane vs Lucy Newman / Kara McCaa6-2, 6-0
2021-06-24vs Lee/PowersLost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Camden / Andrea Keller vs Lori Cox / Megan Bradshaw6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChristine Cowen vs Sylvia Mapp3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStacey Baum / Madeleine Leighton vs Linda Powers / Perry DiBona3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for VA Beach Patron's Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Betty Domanski
published 4
3.35
Erin Camden
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Christine Cowen
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Kimberly Cummings
published
2.86
Andrea Keller
published 3
Helen Miller
published 3
2.70
Stacey Baum
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Jill Eyler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Camden + Christine Cowen6058% gamesnot enough data
Betty Domanski + Christine Cowen5086% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Baum + Erin Camden213 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Baum + Christine Cowen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Betty Domanski
102W–59L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
3.5
Erin Camden
141W–91L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Christine Cowen
107W–97L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Kimberly Cummings
12W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Andrea Keller
10W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Helen Miller
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacey Baum
28W–48L career · 6 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
Jill Eyler
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.