Teams

NCostello (Springfield)

2026 Summer Doubles USTA Flex League · 3.0 Summer Women Doubles; Daytime

3 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · 3.0 Summer Women Doubles; Daytime
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETindel (Charlotte CC)8080125
2CLetorney (Piper Glen)7070138
3KVaughan (WSRC) The Heatstrokes)6161549
4ARingle (Springfield)6363972
5NCostello (Springfield)5252441
6MAllen (Sardis); Summer Love4242432
7ACombs (BCC); Slicing Mavens45451290
8DMandel/McCain (JCC)3434963
9ABoulton-Samuels; Aperol1 (Piper Glen)35351171
10NPratt (Blakeney); Victorious Secret26261393
11EFagg (Charlotte CC); SEW27271491
12ABoulton-Samuels/LDS; Aperol2 (Piper Glen)181817102
13LCobb (Sardis); Sun, Sets, and Match08081692

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Natalie Costello
published
2.79
Kara Ward
published
Julie Swanson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Costello
23W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kara Ward
30W–32L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Julie Swanson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.