Teams

NJ BLUE

2023 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

8 players · average NTRP 3.57 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-29vs BCST YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesKira Moore / Renee Richker vs Kimberly Barben / Molly Beach6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Bristol / Kris Hansen vs Deborah Lawson / Carol Zimlinghaus7-6, 7-5
2023-04-22vs RCC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Shawn / Renee Richker vs Tonya Johnson / Amelia Taljaard3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErin Manzolillo / Kris Hansen vs Barbara Sands / Karen Boisnard3-6, 5-7
2023-04-15vs NJ GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Manzolillo / Kira Moore vs Holland Asbach / Julie Lochner4-6, 4-6
2023-04-08vs BP REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesHolly Bristol / Renee Richker vs Susan Gallo / Donna Cash4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-04-01vs LPTC ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesKris Hansen / Holly Bristol vs Gwen Riley / Nancy Hiester5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKira Moore vs Carissa Zook6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesErin Manzolillo / Debbie Lipski vs Lauren Anderson / Hilary Murphy6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Stephanie Shawn
published 4
3.37
Kira Moore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
April DeLauro
published 3.5
3.21
Holly Bristol
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Erin Manzolillo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Angela Hale
published 3.5
3.04
Kris Hansen
published
2.96
Renee Richker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kris Hansen + April DeLauro3354% games+6.4% vs expected
Kira Moore + Erin Manzolillo5647% games+3.5% vs expected
Erin Manzolillo + April DeLauro5648% games−8.8% vs expected
Renee Richker + Holly Bristol41241% gamesnot enough data
Kira Moore + Holly Bristol7751% gamesnot enough data
Kira Moore + Renee Richker3444% gamesnot enough data
Renee Richker + April DeLauro314 matchesnot enough data
Kris Hansen + Renee Richker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Shawn
90W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
4.09
3.5
Kira Moore
98W–84L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
April DeLauro
71W–54L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Holly Bristol
42W–78L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Erin Manzolillo
120W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Angela Hale
16W–4L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Kris Hansen
21W–24L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Renee Richker
149W–114L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.