Teams

FWIW

ADULT 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-14vs DigbyLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Meyer / Christine Rahm vs Durette Cawood / Lilian Janet Blinn2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Fields / Yvette Marietta vs Angela Bailey / Penny Digby5-7, 6-7
2026-03-29vs DigbyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Pick / Kristin Pinkstaff vs Lilian Janet Blinn / Durette Cawood2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Mogavero / Chris Whorley vs Cindy Bittenbinder / Cathy Foreman6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Meyer / Amy Fields vs Cheryl Geisler / Amy Hancock0-6, 5-7
2026-03-21vs SmithWon 21
L#1 DoublesYvette Marietta / Lisa Jordan vs Febes Kavanagh / Nancy Risinger6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Raborn / Tamara Hodges vs Kelly Lee / Lisa Orr2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Pick / Kristin Pinkstaff vs Betty Smith / Allyn Testroet6-2, 6-4
2026-03-21vs SmithWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Jordan / Yvette Marietta vs Nancy Risinger / Febes Kavanagh6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Raborn / Tamara Hodges vs Kelly Lee / Melissa Patterson6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Fields / Kristin Pinkstaff vs Betty Smith / Lisa Orr6-4, 6-3
2026-03-15vs DavisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Meyer / Yvette Marietta vs Dana Pendleton / Shay Simpson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobin Mogavero / Chris Whorley vs Lori Brown / Tammy Conatser3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Fields / Christine Rahm vs Sharon Bullock / Vereleta Saraceno3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-15vs DavisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Meyer / Yvette Marietta vs Dana Pendleton / Lori Brown5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRobin Mogavero / Chris Whorley vs Donna Miller / Tammy Conatser7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmy Fields / Christine Rahm vs Roxie Johnson / Shay Simpson3-6, 3-6
2026-03-08vs DigbyLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Raborn / Tamara Hodges vs Cindy Bittenbinder / Angela Bailey2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Meyer / Amy Fields vs Cathy Foreman / Pat Haygood6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesYvette Marietta / Lisa Jordan vs Amy Hancock / Cheryl Geisler1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FWIW3491227210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Amy Raborn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Chris Whorley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Yvette Marietta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.21
Kristin Pinkstaff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Melissa Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.21
Lisa Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Amy Fields
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Sarah Pick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Robin Mogavero
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Christine Rahm
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.71
Tamara Hodges
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Fields + Melissa Meyer8358% games+4.9% vs expected
Amy Fields + Sarah Pick2639% games+2.5% vs expected
Christine Rahm + Chris Whorley1540% gamesnot enough data
Amy Fields + Kristin Pinkstaff134 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Pinkstaff + Melissa Meyer314 matchesnot enough data
Tamara Hodges + Amy Raborn213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Fields + Robin Mogavero213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Jordan + Yvette Marietta123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Raborn
50W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Chris Whorley
21W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Yvette Marietta
89W–62L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Kristin Pinkstaff
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Melissa Meyer
42W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Lisa Jordan
94W–67L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Amy Fields
29W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Sarah Pick
9W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Robin Mogavero
31W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3.5
Christine Rahm
16W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
Tamara Hodges
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.