Teams

LAL Women's 6.5 Combo - MaKenna

2022 WI Combo · WI Combo 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-11vs LAL Women's 6.5 Combo - MindiLost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Roraff / Bette Smith vs Heather Meyer / Amy Harter6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTeresa Mears / Kristine Bartley vs Carly Meddaugh / Sarah Siegler6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTaylor Nelson / Lora Cadwell vs Mindi Stolle / Jennifer Carr1-6, 3-6
2022-08-04Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Zink / Catherine Roraff vs Amy Marcou / Amy Harter1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Mears / Mary Aschenbrenner vs Carly Meddaugh / Jennifer Carr1-6, 2-6
2022-07-21vs LAL Women's 6.5 Combo - MindiLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaKenna Kalosis / Kristine Bartley vs Mindi Stolle / Judith Engen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLora Cadwell / Bette Smith vs Sarah Mosley / Sarah Siegler6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTaylor Nelson / Catherine Roraff vs Jennifer Carr / Ellen Seithamer3-6, 2-6
2022-07-14vs LAL Women's 6.5 Combo - MindiLost 03
L#1 DoublesStacey McIlquham / Lora Cadwell vs Judith Engen / Ellen Seithamer5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristine Bartley / Bette Smith vs Jennifer Carr / Mindi Stolle5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTaylor Nelson / Mary Aschenbrenner vs Amy Marcou / Sarah Siegler4-6, 3-6
2022-07-07vs LAL Women's 6.5 Combo - MindiWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Zink / Catherine Roraff vs Carly Meddaugh / Barb Buswell7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStacey McIlquham / Kristine Bartley vs Heather Meyer / Sarah Siegler6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBette Smith / Mary Aschenbrenner vs Leslie Peickert-Kroker / Jennifer Carr1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-30vs LAL Women's 6.5 Combo - MindiWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaKenna Kalosis / Mary Aschenbrenner vs Mindi Stolle / Amy Harter6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLora Cadwell / Teresa Mears vs Judith Engen / Ellen Seithamer3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKristine Bartley / Taylor Nelson vs Barb Buswell / Sarah Mosley6-2, 6-0
2022-06-23vs LAL Women's 6.5 Combo - MindiLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Roraff / Stacey McIlquham vs Sarah Siegler / Mindi Stolle4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJulie Zink / Darlene Isaacson vs Amy Marcou / Barb Buswell7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristine Bartley / MaKenna Kalosis vs Heather Meyer / Jennifer Carr3-6, 6-7
2022-06-16vs LAL Women's 6.5 Combo - MindiWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Roraff / Taylor Nelson vs Carly Meddaugh / Marcia Camden6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBette Smith / Kristine Bartley vs Amy Harter / Ellen Seithamer6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLauri Ford / Teresa Mears vs Sarah Mosley / Judith Engen4-6, 6-7
2022-06-09vs LAL Women's 6.5 Combo - MindiLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Mears / Kristine Bartley vs Amy Marcou / Jennifer Carr5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaKenna Kalosis / Catherine Roraff vs Heather Meyer / Judith Engen4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStacey McIlquham / Mary Aschenbrenner vs Leslie Peickert-Kroker / Amy Harter4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LAL Women's 6.5 Combo - Mindi6318921235
2LAL Women's 6.5 Combo - MaKenna3691839272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bette Smith
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
Catherine Roraff
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Julie Zink
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Kristine Bartley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lauri Ford
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Lora Cadwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
MaKenna Kalosis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Mary Aschenbrenner
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 10% · published
Taylor Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Teresa Mears
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Roraff + Kristine Bartley2448% gamesnot enough data
Kristine Bartley + Lora Cadwell224 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Bartley + Bette Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bette Smith
65W–43L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
Catherine Roraff
12W–16L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Zink
22W–22L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristine Bartley
58W–41L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauri Ford
13W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lora Cadwell
20W–22L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
MaKenna Kalosis
22W–25L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Aschenbrenner
50W–61L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Taylor Nelson
9W–12L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Teresa Mears
6W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.