Teams

Isleworth-Siegel

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 40 & Over- SPRING-DAY · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-23vs USTA-OliverLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarey Sheffield / Kristie Mansilla vs Debra Knerr / Jodi Rowe4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAllison Bolanovich / Kristie Mansilla vs Jennifer Cathcart / Carol Quagliata4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShamila Sharma / Noelle Siegel vs Christine Samek-Yonge / Mindy Steinberg4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-04-25vs Maitland-CooperLost 03
L#1 DoublesNoelle Siegel / Ashley Appleby vs Amy Favero / Courtney Maloney3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKristie Mansilla vs Ashleigh Torres2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCristiane Quege / Carey Sheffield vs Lindsey Kovaleski / Sarah Tomlinson0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesAshley Appleby / Noelle Siegel vs Lori Burshan / Stacey Brack1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMeghan Mannella / Jen Small vs Davia Moss / Blaire Lynch4-6, 3-6
2025-04-18vs Lake Cane-ChapmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley Appleby / Kristie Mansilla vs Mandy Pike / Jennifer Dubasak4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHeather Doyle vs Marissa Woodruff4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Jessica Strack
published
2.84
Kimberly Ehrhard
published
2.79
Ashley Appleby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Carey Sheffield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Heather Doyle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kristie Mansilla
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Meghan Mannella
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Noelle Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Castano
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Strack
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Kimberly Ehrhard
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Ashley Appleby
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Allison Bolanovich
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carey Sheffield
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Heather Doyle
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristie Mansilla
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Meghan Mannella
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Noelle Siegel
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Castano
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.